ARTICLES AND NOTES

ARTICLES

The Evolution of the Right to Privacy

　PUBLIC LAW REVIEW,VOL.21(1995)
CONTENTS
T　Introduction
U　Recognition of the Right to Privacy
　　　(1)The Origins of the Legal Right to Privacy
　　　(2)Legal Precedent of the Privacy
　　　(3)Bringing a Privacy Law into Force
V　Consolidation of the Tort Right to Privacy
　　　(1)William L. Prosser's Disparate Tort Theory and the Four Part Interest Analysis
　　　(2)1. Intrusion upon the Plaintiff's Seclusion or Solitude,or into his Private Affairs
　　　(3)2. Public Disclosure of Embarrassing Private Facts about the Plaintiff
　　　(4)3. Publicity which Places the Plaintiff in a False Light in the Public Eye
　　　(5)4. Appropriation, for the Defendant's Advantage, of the Plaintiff's Name or Likeness
W　Conclusion

The substantive Due Process and the Constitutional Right to Privacy.

　PUBLIC LAW REVIEW,VOL.22(1996)
CONTENTS
　　　Introduction
Chapter 1.The Background of the Constitutional Right to Privacy.
Chapter 2.The Substantive Due Process Theory" as a Security Means of the Property Right
　　　1."The Substantive Due Process Theory".
　　　2.The Formation of the Theory.
　　　3.The Establishment of the Theory.
　　　4.The Termination of the Theory.
　　　5.The Augury of the Resurrection of the Theory.
Chapter 3.　The Substantive Due Process Theory" as a Security Means of the Right to Privacy.
　　　1.The Resurrection of "The Substantive Due Process Theory". - Roe v. Wade.
　　　 (a)The Point at Issue in the Roe Decision.
　　　 (b)The Opinion of the Court Delivered by Justice Blackmun.
　　　 (c)Concurring and Dissenting opinion of the other Justice.
　　　2.After Roe Case.
　　　　A.Abortion Controversy.
　　　　　(1)Pre-1989.
　　　　　(2)Post-1989.
　　　　　　a.Webster v.Reproductive Health Services.
　　　　　　b.Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v.Casey.
　　　　　(3)The Standard for a Regulation of Abortion.
　　　　 B.Homosexual's Sodomy Sexual Orientation. -Bowers v.Hardwick-

Michael Adler,Cyberspace, General Searches, and Digital Contraband: The Fourth Amendment and the Net-Wide Search,105 Yale L. J. 1093 (1996) Translated by Fumio Shimpo

PUBLIC LAW REVIEW,VOL 23(1997)
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
T.THE SEARCH
　　　A.Life in Cyberspace
　　　B.The World of "Digital Contraband"
　　　C.Law Enforcement Cruises the Net
U.THE LAW
　　　A.The Pre-Katz Bright-Line Standard
　　　B.Katz and Beyond : The Balancing Approach
V.AN UNBALANCED TEST: WHAT'S MISSING?
　　　A.The Need for Autonomy and Refuge
　　　B.A Government of Limited Powers
CONCLUSION　：　A NEW BALANCE

NOTES

The National Consensus which is Sustaining the Capital Punishment in Japan

1.The Capital Punishment which is Sustained by an Opinion Survey
2.The Capital Punishment Controversy
3.The Grounds for the Maintenance of the Capital Punishment
4.The Grounds for the Abolition of the Capital Punishment
5.The Tangent of the Maintenance or Abolition Controversy
　Conclusion

Supreme Court of the United States Struck down the Communications Decency Act of 1996.

APPENDIXES

Line Item Veto Act of 1995

Engrossed House Amendment

Enrolled Bill (Sent to President)

Supreme Court Deletes Line-Item Veto

CLINTON v. CITY OF NEW YORK,APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,No. 97-1374.Argued April 27, 1998-Decided June 25, 1998.

Syllabus
　

Safe Schools Internet Act of 1998

Internet School Filtering Act of 1998)

　

Last Updated：
©1998-2003 SHIMPO Fumio
　All rights reserved.